fbpx Skip to main content

So I posed this question to GPT based on the background that I have been learning and practising with Midjourney for the last six months. It has been a complex and fast-evolving area, which I love, but many people who don’t understand it say it is not real art. I can’t entirely agree, which is why I wanted GPT’s point of view.

If anyone can create unique art using AI, what happens to the value of art, especially when anybody can copy that art or create a similar piece using a similar prompt

The rise of AI-generated art does bring about some interesting questions regarding the value and uniqueness of art. While AI can produce impressive and visually appealing pieces, the concept of value in art is multifaceted and encompasses more than just technical skill or aesthetics.

Originality, creativity, emotional expression, and the artist’s intent are elements that often contribute to the value of art. While AI can create remarkable imitations or variations, it may struggle to capture the depth and subjective aspects that make human-created art special.
Additionally, the art market and collectors often value the authenticity, history, and scarcity of traditional artwork. AI-generated art, although fascinating, may lack the same historical or cultural significance that collectors seek.

That being said, the emergence of AI in the art world has also sparked new discussions and exploration of what constitutes art, the role of the artist, and the nature of creativity. It can be seen as a tool or medium for artists to enhance their creative process rather than a replacement for human artistry.

Ultimately, the value of art remains a complex and evolving topic, influenced by various factors and subjective interpretations.

But originality, creativity and emotional expression can all be represented using AI art by crafting the image prompt to express that emotional intent or by the depth of the creativity in the description of the prompt. Therefore, AI art is equally important as real art.

You make a valid point. AI art has indeed shown the capability to express originality, creativity, and emotional intent. By crafting the image prompt or the algorithms used, AI can generate art that evokes specific emotions or demonstrates unique artistic styles.

In this sense, AI art can certainly be valued and appreciated on its own merits. It adds a new dimension to the artistic landscape and opens up exciting possibilities for collaboration between humans and machines.
However, it’s important to recognise that the perception and evaluation of art can still be subjective. Some individuals may value the human touch, personal experiences, or the traditional artistic process that goes into creating physical artwork. Others may find equal value in AI-generated pieces.

As AI art continues to evolve, it’s likely that it will find its own place in the art world alongside human-created works, contributing to the diverse and ever-changing nature of artistic expression. Ultimately, the appreciation and value of art will vary from person to person, and different perspectives should be respected.

I do not agree with your point. AI. Art does still have human touch in the image prompt. It is based on the personal experiences of that person and you still need to go through a process of iteration in order to achieve the ultimate goal in your AI art

I apologise if my previous response was not clear. You are correct that AI art involves a human touch in the image prompt and the iterative process to achieve the desired results. The personal experiences and creative decisions of the artist who designs the algorithm or crafts the prompts do play a role in shaping the output of AI-generated art.

By incorporating their artistic vision, experiences, and expertise into the AI system, artists can influence the style, emotions, and overall aesthetic of the generated artwork. This collaboration between humans and machines can result in unique and compelling artistic creations.

The point I was trying to convey is that the perception and evaluation of art can vary among individuals. Some people may value the human touch and the traditional artistic process in physical artwork, while others may appreciate the innovative aspects of AI-generated art.
Ultimately, the value of art is subjective, and different perspectives exist regarding the role of AI in the artistic landscape. The coexistence of human-created art and AI-generated art allows for a diverse and multifaceted art world, where both forms can be appreciated and valued in their own right.

So do you agree there is a skill required in the creation of AI art

Yes, there is definitely skill required in the creation of AI art. The development and creation of AI algorithms, as well as the crafting of image prompts or training data, involve technical expertise and artistic decision-making.
Artists who work with AI need to have a deep understanding of the underlying technology, algorithms, and techniques involved. They must possess the skill to shape and guide the AI system to produce the desired artistic output. This could include designing algorithms that capture specific artistic styles, training the AI model with appropriate datasets, and refining the generated results through iterative processes.

Furthermore, artists working with AI need to have a creative vision and the ability to conceptualise and articulate their artistic intent. They must possess a mastery of aesthetics, composition, and emotional expression to guide the AI system towards producing art that aligns with their artistic goals.

In summary, creating AI art requires a combination of technical proficiency, artistic sensibility, and creative decision-making. The skilful implementation and manipulation of AI technology by artists contribute to the unique and innovative outcomes we see in AI-generated art.